When the sports editor of a daily newspaper used to hand out copies of Football Pink after a match, it was their only chance to tell fans about the latest developments in their club. Now, social media platforms show goals within seconds of them being scored and fan-focused digital media such as The Anfield Wrap and Stoke City’s Oatcake fanzine are competing for the attention of fans, who no longer expect to find all of their club news on the front page of their paper. This has changed the way that sports journalists work; they now focus more on the stream than on their notebooks.

Weekly Recap: What Happened in Sports

메이저 토토사이트 has led to a proliferation of websites that offer the same “sports site essentials”: scores, news, columnists/blogs and rumors. Some of these websites also have video interviews and highlights. Despite this proliferation, many readers still want to know the details of a particular event. This is why the straight-lead game story remains popular with high school and college athletes, where the score of a game may not be as important as the performance of individual players.

There is much debate about how sports journalism should be conducted. Some academics point out that some of the practices of sports journalists are problematic, such as relying on celebrity or slo-mo cameras to grab audience interest; making unsubstantiated claims about a player’s injury (eg that he has a torn anterior cruciate ligament) and using language that only dedicated sport fans would understand (“heave” instead of the technical term for the knee, which is an ACL). Other critics question whether a focus on the ‘bad boys’ of sport, who do things like use banned drugs and make ‘controversial’ decisions, gives sport a bad name.…